Clearly, the Clinton campaign needed to lessen the political damage. Much to the embarrassment of Hillary Clinton, the released files showed that the DNC had secretly collaborated with her campaign to promote her candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination over that of Bernie Sanders. He then posted online DNC computer files that contained metadata that indicated Russian involvement in the hack. The next day, a self-described Romanian hacker, Guccifer 2.0, claimed he was a WikiLeaks source and had hacked the DNC’s server. Two days later, CrowdStrike, a computer security company working for the Democratic National Committee, announced that it had detected Russian malware on the DNC’s computer server. On June 12, 2016, WikiLeaks announced that it would soon release stolen computer files that pertained to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. George Parry is a former state and federal prosecutor practicing law in Philadelphia. Will special counsel Mueller examine the DNC server, source of the great Russiagate caper? Parry explains how it was done and the implications. which conclusively proves that there was no hacking of the DNC computer and that the information was downloaded from within the DNC and then used to orchestrate a fake Russian hacking of the election. Septem| Categories: Guest Contributions | Tags: | Print This Articleįormer federal prosecutor George Parry read the report by the association of Veteran Intelligence Professionals.
0 kommentar(er)
